Part Three
Theology Proper: 16 PHILOSOPHICAL ARGUMENTS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD
A DISPENSATIONAL THEOLOGY
By Charles F Baker
Theology Proper: 16 PHILOSOPHICAL ARGUMENTS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD
A DISPENSATIONAL THEOLOGY
By Charles F Baker
Kant, in his Critique
of Pure Reason, followed in Hume’s footsteps and contended further that we
cannot legitimately argue from the facts of sense experience to that which
transcends sense experience, or in other words, the fact that every event must
have a cause applies only to the world of our sense experience: we cannot know
whether it applies outside the realm of empirical knowledge. This, of course,
is the position of agnosticism. Kant also argued that we have no way of knowing
when we have arrived at the first cause. These conclusions of Hume and Kant
derive largely from their epistemology, or their theory of knowledge.
PREVIOUS
NEXT
No comments:
Post a Comment